Thursday, June 26, 2014

Is "Pods" generic for promoting self storage goods and services?

We'll have to let the experts opine on that question.  U-Haul is using the words "pod" and "pods" on its website to attract web traffic.  PODS Enterprises, Inc. ("PEI") owns a number of federal trademark registrations for PODS (and associated designs).  See Registration Nos. 2,365,848, 3,011,459, 3,666,828, and 3,689,446.  PEI sued U-Haul for trademark infringement.  (U-Haul has sought cancellation of the four registrations).

In its defense in the litigation, U-Haul is arguing that "pods" is generic for portable containers used in transportation and storage of goods.  (As you'll likely recall, generic trademarks are no trademarks at all.  The test generally followed is the primary significance test; i.e. what is the primary significance of the mark in question in the minds of the consuming public -- to identify the goods or the producer of the goods?  If it identifies the goods, the mark is generic.  If its primary significance is to identify the producer, the mark is not generic.)  The most widely used survey to resolve genericness issues is known as a Teflon survey:
A Teflon survey first establishes whether the respondent grasps the distinction between comon names (airline or automobile) and brand names (American Airlines or Chevrolet), and then asks the respondent to categorize a number of terms as common or brand...
See also E.T. Browne Drug Co. v. Cococare Prods., Inc., 538 F.3d 185, 195 (3d Cir. 2008).   Here, U-Haul's expert designed a Teflon survey "to determine whether U.S. consumers who are likely to use moving and storage services understand the principal or primary significance of the terms 'pods' and 'pod' in the context of moving and storage to be a brand or proprietary name or, alternatively, to be a common or generic name."

The expert testified that the relevant consuming public was those people "likely to use moving and storage services."  But the survey (of 694 respondents) was only conducted on people who had actually  moved in the past few years or those that were expecting to move within the next year.  PEI believed the survey methodology was flawed for 2 reasons.  First, it included too few people because it did not include people who were likely to use storage services over the next year (it only included those likely to move over the next year).  Second, the survey included too many people because it included respondents who intended to move without using a moving or storage company.  PEI challenged the expert's methodology as flawed, and called on the Court as gatekeeper to exclude the expert under Daubert.

The Court dispensed with the motion quickly:
The general reliability of Teflon surveys cannot be questioned, given their wide acceptance.  See In re DaimlerChrysler AG, Serial No. 74/734,869 (TTAB July 26, 001) ("The so-called ‘Teflon survey’ is widely accepted in determining whether a term is generic.”); Anheuser–Busch Inc. v. Stroh BreweryCo., 750 F.2d 631, 639 (8th Cir.1984) (characterizing a Teflon survey as “properly conducted”); Invisible Fence, Inc. v. Fido ‘s Fence, Inc., No.3:09–CV–25, 2013 WL 6191634 (E.D.Tenn. Nov.26, 2013) (accepting a survey that “generally” complies with Teflon ). Rather, PEI perceives multiple technical deficiencies in Dr. Wood's survey, including an improper universe of respondents and improper questioning.
Such technical deficiencies go to the weight of Dr. Wood's opinions, not their admissibility.
Motion to Exclude Expert, Denied.
Pods Enterprises, Inc. v. U-Haul International, Inc., Case No. 8:12-cv-1479 (M.D. Fla. June 12, 2014) (J. Whittemore)

6 comments:

  1. Thanks for motivating write-up. I am going to approach self storage in Strathpine for residential needs. Please help me with expert tips and suggestions.

    ReplyDelete
  2. Well, when it comes to small or movable as well as portable storage solution make sure to focus on quality of the pods storage unit so that your goods will be safe inside for longer.

    ReplyDelete
  3. Selecting a best self storage will be a resistless task, mainly when you are not much well-known of all the options accessible to the renters at a self storage.

    self storage Wynnum

    ReplyDelete
  4. Moving to a new city or country can be quite stressful if you do not hire good packers and movers. For international as well as national relocations, a top packing and moving company from Singapore is the best choice.
    Thanks for sharing...!!!

    ReplyDelete
  5. As far as I can tell, the case itself fails to acknowledge that "pod" and "pods" are in fact quite different. "Pods" is indeed a trademark and standard for "Portable On Demand Storage". Therefore, I can absolutely see the infringement value of U-Haul using "pods". However, "pod" is an entirely different case. A "pod" has become a general term for portable storage and moving containers, referring to the industry as a whole and not a specific brand. I'm curious as to why such a distinction was not made in the ruling. Does this mean that the judge considers the use of "pod" to be the same as "pods", resulting in infringement?

    ReplyDelete
  6. I see the argument against "PODS", considering that U-Haul was promoting a portable storage solution. But what about "POD"? I don't believe anyone currently has a trademark on the term "POD". What is your stance on using 'pod' instead of 'pods'?

    ReplyDelete